Law v. Wesley

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 6, 2009
• Docket: 09-6594
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6594

DARRELL LAW,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ZELDA ELIZABETH WESLEY, AUSA; RITA R. VALDRINI, US Attorney; THOMAS E. JOHNSTON, US Attorney; JOHN S. KAULL, US Magistrate; IRENE M. KEELEY, US District Judge; JO JO ANTOLOCK, WV State Police,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:06-cv-00096-JPB-JES)

Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 6, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell Law, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darrell Law appeals the district court’s order denying

his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to vacate the court’s order

adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Law

v. Wesley, No. 3:06-cv-00096-JPB-JES (N.D. W. Va. July 3, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED