Law v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Law v. State

466 P.2d 656, 86 Nev. 161, 1970 Nev. LEXIS 474

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided March 5, 1970·No. No. 6033·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The briefs and the record on appeal having been given full consideration, and finding that there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the jury verdict below, and [162]*162that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error, the respondent’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Sanchez v. State, 85 Nev. 95, 450 P.2d 793 (1969).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

The briefs and the record on appeal having been given full consideration, and finding that there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the jury verdict below, and [162]*162that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error, the respondent’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted, and this appeal is dismissed. Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Sanchez v. State, 85 Nev. 95, 450 P.2d 793 (1969).

Law v. State, 466 P.2d 656, 86 Nev. 161, 1970 Nev. LEXIS 474 (Neb. 1970).

Pincite

466 P.2d 656 (Law v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related