Law v. State
This text of 316 So. 2d 545 (Law v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause was transferred to us by the Fourth District Court of Appeal pursuant to the provisions of Florida Appellate Rule 2.1, subd. a(5)(d), after an examination of the record' revealed that the trial court entered an order initially and directly passing upon the validity of a State statute.1 Ac-, cordingly, we have jurisdiction pursuant to Article V, Section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution.
Appellant was charged by information with three separate counts of sale of obscene materials in violation of Florida Statute Section 847.011. The offenses allegedly occurred during the months of April and May of 1972. A jury found appellant guilty of all three offenses on June 9, 1972. This appeal seeks a reversal of those convictions based, inter alia, upon a challenge to the constitutionality of Florida Statute Section 847.011.
From the above dates, it is evident that this is another conviction that was pending at the time the United States Supreme [546]*546Court decided Miller v. California.
Accordingly, in view of these decisions and in light of our recent holding in Fon-tana v. State,
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 So. 2d 545, 1975 Fla. LEXIS 3538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/law-v-state-fla-1975.