Law v. Lake Metroparks

Ohio Supreme Court

Law v. Lake Metroparks

2007 Ohio 6749, 116 Ohio St. 3d 322

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 20, 2007·No. 2007-0298·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

(¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist., 116 Ohio St.3d 148, 2007-Ohio-5586, 876 N.E.2d 1210.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Disk O’Donnell, J., not participating. *323 Gibson, Brelo, Ziccarelli & Martello and Joseph Gibson, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Dist., 116 Ohio St.3d 148, 2007-Ohio-5586, 876 N.E.2d 1210.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Houck v. Bd. of Park Commrs. of the Huron Cty. Park Disk O’Donnell, J., not participating. *323 Gibson, Brelo, Ziccarelli & Martello and Joseph Gibson, for appellee.

Law v. Lake Metroparks, 2007 Ohio 6749, 116 Ohio St. 3d 322 (Ohio 2007).

Pincite

2007 Ohio 6749 (Law v. Lake Metroparks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related