Law v. Gulf States Steel Co.
This text of 175 So. 326 (Law v. Gulf States Steel Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
' The opinion of the Court of Appeals states that the facts disclosed on the last *353 trial are different from those presented and considered upon former appeal. 224 Ala. 667, 141 So. 641. Assuming this statement to be true, which we must do, the holding of said court is not shown to be in conflict with the opinion of this court in 224 Ala. This conclusion renders it unnecessary for us to consider and pass upon the correctness of the comment by the Court of Appeals as to the Virginia Case (Riverside & Dan River Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Waugh, 117 Va. 386, 84 S.E. 658) or our own case, Southern Railway Company v. Plott, 131 Ala. 312, 31 So. 33.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 So. 326, 234 Ala. 352, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/law-v-gulf-states-steel-co-ala-1937.