Home/New York Court of Chancery/Law v. Ford

Law v. Ford

2 Paige Ch. 310, 1830 N.Y. LEXIS 419, 1830 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 46
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedNovember 10, 1830
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 2 Paige Ch. 310 (Law v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Law v. Ford, 2 Paige Ch. 310, 1830 N.Y. LEXIS 419, 1830 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 46 (N.Y. 1830).

Opinion

The Chancellor

said that, as a general rule, each partner had an equal right to the possesion of the partnership ef- • fects, and to collect and apply them in satisfaction of the debts of thé firm. That where either party had a right to dissolve the partnership, and the agreement between the partiés. made no provision for closing- up the concern, it was of course to appoint a manager or receiver, on a bill filed for that purpose, if they could not arrange the matter between themselves. .That in such a case the court would direct the receiver to apply the partnership property and funds to the payment of all the debts of the firm, rateably, without giving a preference to the favorite creditors of either partner. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oyama v. Stuart
22 Haw. 693 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1915)
Fleming v. Carson
62 P. 374 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1900)
Blum v. Van Vechten
66 N.W. 507 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1896)
Cannon v. Baltimore & Ohio Employes' Relief Ass'n
1 Balt. C. Rep. 83 (Baltimore City Circuit Court, 1890)
Hubbell v. Buhler
50 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 82 (New York Supreme Court, 1887)
Jackson v. Lahee
2 N.E. 172 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1885)
McElvey v. . Lewis
76 N.Y. 373 (New York Court of Appeals, 1879)
Crosswell v. Lehman, Durr & Co.
54 Ala. 363 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1875)
Richards v. . Baurman
65 N.C. 162 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1871)
Waterbury v. Merchants' Union Express Co.
3 Abb. Pr. 163 (New York Supreme Court, 1867)
Randall v. Morrell
17 N.J. Eq. 343 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1866)
Cox v. Peters
13 N.J. Eq. 39 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1860)
Wetter v. Schlieper
6 Abb. Pr. 123 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1858)
Adams v. Haskell
1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 362 (Cal. District Court, 1857)
Wilson v. Fitchter
3 N.J. Eq. 71 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1855)
Birdsall v. Colie
10 N.J. Eq. 63 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1854)
Walker v. House
4 Md. Ch. 39 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1848)
Waring v. Robinson
1 Hoff. Ch. 524 (New York Court of Chancery, 1840)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Paige Ch. 310, 1830 N.Y. LEXIS 419, 1830 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/law-v-ford-nychanct-1830.