Law Offices of James M. Russ, P.A. v. Cone
716 So. 2d 853, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11325, 1998 WL 559398
This text of 716 So. 2d 853 (Law Offices of James M. Russ, P.A. v. Cone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Law Offices of James M. Russ, P.A. v. Cone, 716 So. 2d 853, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11325, 1998 WL 559398 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).
Opinion
AFFIRMED. See Stockman v. Downs, 573 So.2d 835 (Fla.1991); King v. Young, Berkman, Berman & Karpf, P.A., 709 So.2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (bonus provision of contract making part of fee contingent upon results obtained in a divorce action was void, but firm was still entitled to recover quantum meruit for its services).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Stockman v. Downs
573 So. 2d 835 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
King v. Young, Berkman, Berman & Karpf
709 So. 2d 572 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
716 So. 2d 853, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 11325, 1998 WL 559398, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/law-offices-of-james-m-russ-pa-v-cone-fladistctapp-1998.