Law Office of Michael B. Brehne, P.A. v. Porter Law Firm, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Law Office of Michael B. Brehne, P.A. v. Porter Law Firm, LLC

268 So. 3d 854

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 15, 2019

DocketCase Nos. 5D17-3850; 5D17-3855

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 268 So. 3d 854 (Law Office of Michael B. Brehne, P.A. v. Porter Law Firm, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Law Office of Michael B. Brehne, P.A. v. Porter Law Firm, LLC, 268 So. 3d 854 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Law Office of Michael B. Brehne, P.A. ("Law Office"), appeals a final *855summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Southern-Owners Insurance Company (collectively, "the Insurers"), finding that the Insurers had not impaired Law Office's charging lien on the settlement proceeds paid to its former client and her newly retained counsel. The Insurers concede that Law Office properly perfected its charging lien before they disbursed the settlement proceeds to the former client's newly retained counsel. They contend that because the charging lien attaches only to the disputed funds, which are held in the newly retained counsel's trust account, Law Office's lien has not been impaired. We agree and affirm the trial court's judgment.

An attorney's charging lien attaches to the tangible fruits of the services. Correa v. Christensen, 780 So.2d 220, 220 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (citing Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom, 428 So.2d 1383 (Fla. 1983) ). Once a charging lien has been perfected, it is enforceable against "any person who, at the time notice of intent to claim a lien is given, holds monies or property which become proceeds of a judgment to be entered in the future." Hutchins v. Hutchins, 522 So.2d 547, 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Here, although the Insurers had notice of Law Office's charging lien, they paid the settlement proceeds to the newly retained counsel who agreed to hold, and has continued to hold, the disputed funds in trust.¹ Because the funds are in trust, Law Office's lien has not been impaired. However, should that situation change in the future, the Insurers cannot avoid liability for the attorney's fees subject to Law Office's lien simply because it transferred the funds to a third party. See Hall, Lamb & Hall, P.A. v. Sherlon Invs. Corp., 7 So.3d 639, 641 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The Law Office of Michael B. Brehne, P.A. ("Law Office"), appeals a final *855summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Southern-Owners Insurance Company (collectively, "the Insurers"), finding that the Insurers had not impaired Law Office's charging lien on the settlement proceeds paid to its former client and her newly retained counsel. The Insurers concede that Law Office properly perfected its charging lien before they disbursed the settlement proceeds to the former client's newly retained counsel. They contend that because the charging lien attaches only to the disputed funds, which are held in the newly retained counsel's trust account, Law Office's lien has not been impaired. We agree and affirm the trial court's judgment.

An attorney's charging lien attaches to the tangible fruits of the services. Correa v. Christensen, 780 So.2d 220, 220 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (citing Sinclair, Louis, Siegel, Heath, Nussbaum & Zavertnik, P.A. v. Baucom, 428 So.2d 1383 (Fla. 1983) ). Once a charging lien has been perfected, it is enforceable against "any person who, at the time notice of intent to claim a lien is given, holds monies or property which become proceeds of a judgment to be entered in the future." Hutchins v. Hutchins, 522 So.2d 547, 549 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Here, although the Insurers had notice of Law Office's charging lien, they paid the settlement proceeds to the newly retained counsel who agreed to hold, and has continued to hold, the disputed funds in trust.¹ Because the funds are in trust, Law Office's lien has not been impaired. However, should that situation change in the future, the Insurers cannot avoid liability for the attorney's fees subject to Law Office's lien simply because it transferred the funds to a third party. See Hall, Lamb & Hall, P.A. v. Sherlon Invs. Corp., 7 So.3d 639, 641 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, BERGER and WALLIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 So. 3d 854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/law-office-of-michael-b-brehne-pa-v-porter-law-firm-llc-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack