Law Office of Dario Diaz, P.A. v. FirstBank Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Law Office of Dario Diaz, P.A. v. FirstBank Florida

94 So. 3d 710, 2012 WL 3535778, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13671

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 17, 2012

DocketNo. 5D11-2263

StatusPublished

This text of 94 So. 3d 710 (Law Office of Dario Diaz, P.A. v. FirstBank Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Law Office of Dario Diaz, P.A. v. FirstBank Florida, 94 So. 3d 710, 2012 WL 3535778, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13671 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the award of attorney’s fees against Appellant because the trial court failed to set forth detailed factual findings describing the specific bad faith conduct [711]*711that resulted in the unnecessary incur-rence of attorney’s fees. We remand this cause for further proceedings. See Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221, 227 (Fla.2002).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the award of attorney’s fees against Appellant because the trial court failed to set forth detailed factual findings describing the specific bad faith conduct [711]*711that resulted in the unnecessary incur-rence of attorney’s fees. We remand this cause for further proceedings. See Moakley v. Smallwood, 826 So.2d 221, 227 (Fla.2002).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

SAWAYA, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 So. 3d 710, 2012 WL 3535778, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 13671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/law-office-of-dario-diaz-pa-v-firstbank-florida-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack