Lavrrick v. State
This text of 45 So. 3d 893 (Lavrrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When he was sixteen years of age in 2005, Lavrrick pled guilty and was sentenced to five years probation for robbery with a deadly weapon and armed carjacking. This appeal is from convictions and concurrent, statutorily authorized sentences to life in prison, see § 775.082, Fla. Stat. (2005), imposed for those offenses upon the finding that he had violated the probation on May 30, 2007, by committing another armed robbery and associated crimes.
Notwithstanding the earnest and able arguments of his counsel to the contrary, we find the evidence at the probation hearing amply supportive of the determination that he had committed the subsequent crimes. Because no other error occurred, the convictions are therefore affirmed.
In Graham v. Florida, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010), however, the United States Supreme Court, in a Florida case, held that unqualified life sentences for non-homicides 1 categorically constituted cruel and unusual punishment when imposed upon persons who were minors when they committed the crimes. We therefore vacate the sentences below and remand for resentencing in accordance with the dictates of Graham.
Affirmed in part, vacated, and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 So. 3d 893, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 13610, 2010 WL 3564702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavrrick-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.