Lavoyce Lee Wilder v. State of Arkansas

2023 Ark. 60

• Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas
• Decided: April 13, 2023
• Status: Published

Opinion

Cite as 2023 Ark. 60 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-22-461

Opinion Delivered: April 13, 2023 LAVOYCE LEE WILDER APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PIKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 55CR-19-72]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE TOM W. APPELLEE COOPER, JUDGE

REMANDED TO SETTLE THE RECORD.

JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice

Appellant LaVoyce Lee Wilder appeals a Pike County Circuit Court order

convicting him of two counts of rape, three counts of first-degree sexual assault, and two

counts of sexual indecency with a child and sentencing him to concurrent sentences of two

terms of life imprisonment, three terms of thirty years’ imprisonment, and two terms of six

years’ imprisonment. For reversal, Wilder argues that the circuit court abused its discretion

by admitting evidence under the pedophile exception to Rule 404(b) of the Arkansas Rules

of Evidence, by denying his motion for mistrial, and by excluding evidence of the victims’

prior sexual conduct under the rape-shield statute. He also contends that his case must be

reversed and remanded for retrial because the record is insufficient. In accordance with

Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 6(e), made applicable to criminal proceedings

pursuant to Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 4(a), we remand the matter to

the circuit court to settle the record. Arkansas Supreme Court Administrative Order No. 4(a) requires a complete record

of all proceedings. It provides that “[t]he circuit court shall require the official court reporter

to make a verbatim record of all proceedings[.]” See also Ark. Code Ann. § 16-13-510(a)

(Supp. 2021) (requiring “a complete record of the proceedings” in “all cases before a circuit

court”). If anything material to either party is omitted from the record, by error or by

accident, we may direct that the omission be corrected and, if necessary, that a supplemental

record be certified and transmitted. See Ark. R. App. P.–Civ. 6(e); Hyatt v. State, 2017 Ark.

296, at 1–2. Further, Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(a) provides that “[w]hen the

sentence is death or life imprisonment, the Court must review all errors prejudicial to the

appellant in accordance with [Arkansas Code Annotated section] 16-91-113(a).”

Here, prior to Wilder’s trial, the circuit court held an in camera rape-shield hearing.

The record reveals that portions of the rape-shield hearing were not recorded or transcribed

because of a purported malfunction with the court reporter’s equipment. The Court

Reporter’s Note in the record states,

Due to a malfunction in equipment, the Court Reporter was unable to extract all of the audio from small portions of the proceedings held in camera. These portions have been noted in that portion of this transcript with (indiscernible).

The rape-shield hearing in the record contains the term “(indiscernible)” repeatedly

throughout statements by counsel and the circuit court. We cannot discern how much of

the transcript was omitted, and at least one ruling is missing. In its brief, the State maintains

that “the [circuit] court’s denial of Wilder’s motion [to exclude evidence] can be inferred

from the available transcript of the in camera rape-shield hearing” and by the subsequent

clarification of its ruling prior to opening statements. There, the circuit court stated, “I want

2 to add something to my ruling in chambers under the rape shield argument from the

defendant[,]” but the record before us does not contain the circuit court’s ruling from the

rape-shield hearing, nor does it contain the full arguments presented by counsel prior to that

ruling. Because this court must conduct a review of the record for adverse rulings and any

prejudicial errors pursuant to Rule 4-3(a), it is impossible to do so without resorting to an

inference of indiscernible portions missing from the record. Thus, in its current state, the

record is insufficient for our appellate review. Accordingly, we remand this matter to the

circuit court to settle the record.

We also direct the circuit court to prepare and transmit to this court within thirty

days of the date of this opinion a certified record that corrects any mistakes and omissions.

During that time, the circuit court may hold a hearing on the matter.

Lassiter & Cassinelli, by: Michael Kiel Kaiser, for appellant.

Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: Rebecca Kane, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.