Lavoie, Michael Paul
This text of Lavoie, Michael Paul (Lavoie, Michael Paul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,160-01
IN RE MICHAEL PAUL LAVOIE, Relator
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS CAUSE NO. F47171A IN THE 18TH DISTRICT COURT FROM JOHNSON COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant
to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends, among other things, that he filed a
motion to recuse Respondent, the Judge of the 18th District Court, and that Respondent has not
responded to his motion.
Rule of Civil Procedure 18a applies to habeas proceedings before trial judges. Ex parte
Sinegar, 324 S.W.3d 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). Regardless of whether a motion complies with
Rule 18a, within three business days after a motion to recuse is filed, a trial judge must either sign
and file an order of recusal or sign and file an order referring the motion to the regional presiding
judge. TEX . R. CIV . P. 18a(f)(1). Respondent shall file a response with this Court within 30 days 2
of the date of this order and state whether Relator has filed a motion to recuse in the trial court and,
if so, whether Respondent has complied with Rule 18a(f)(1). This application for leave to file a writ
of mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted his response.
Filed: October 15. 2014 Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lavoie, Michael Paul, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavoie-michael-paul-texcrimapp-2014.