Lavinda McLeod v. Union Barge Line Company

189 F.2d 610, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3759
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided June 19, 1951·No. 10438_1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal involves claim for damages for personal injuries. The claim is based on the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C.A. § 688, for alleged negligence and upon admiralty law .for alleged unseaworthiness of the vessel on which the plaintiff was injured. The case was tried to a jury which returned a verdict for the defendant. Judgment was entered thereon. The appellant alleges five points for reversal. Four of them are based upon what the judge charged or failed to charge. The fifth is based upon the refusal to award a new trial. No new or unsettled legal points are involved. We disagree with counsel that the trial judge misled the jury or charged it incorrectly on any of the points he raises. Nor do we think that the case is one where a determination by the jury should be upset.

The judgment of the District Court, 95 F.Supp. 336, will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lavinda McLeod v. Union Barge Line Company, 189 F.2d 610, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 3759 (3d Cir. 1951).

189 F.2d 610 (Lavinda McLeod v. Union Barge Line Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miceli v. Interressantskapet Sea Transport
413 F. Supp. 776 (S.D. New York, 1976)