Lavin v. State
946 So. 2d 1151, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21278, 2006 WL 3733037
Opinion
In reviewing Lavin’s petition for writ of habeas corpus in case number 4D03-2579, this court already concluded that the alleged errors did not amount to fundamental error in Lavin’s case. Re-litigation of these issues is barred by collateral estop-pel. There was no error in the trial court summarily denying the post-conviction moP-on'
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lavin v. State, 946 So. 2d 1151, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 21278, 2006 WL 3733037 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
946 So. 2d 1151 (Lavin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.