Lavigne v. Insurance Co. of North America

444 So. 2d 797, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 7993
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided February 1, 1984·No. No. 83-427·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

STOKER, Judge.

This appeal involves the same issues and procedural history described in our opinion rendered this day in Freeman, et al. v. Insurance Company of North America, 444 So.2d 793 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1974), our docket number 83-426. The trial court judgment of April 18, 1983 mentioned in that opinion was a consolidated judgment which included the action of Gerard C. La-vigne. From the dismissal of his action Lavigne appealed to this court.

For the reasons given in the opinion in the Emma Williams suit mentioned above, the judgment of the trial court dated April 18, 1983, dismissing appellant Lavigne’s action is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to Lavigne.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lavigne v. Insurance Co. of North America, 444 So. 2d 797, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 7993 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

444 So. 2d 797 (Lavigne v. Insurance Co. of North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ferry v. Ferry
444 So. 2d 797 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)
Freeman v. Insurance Co. of North America
444 So. 2d 793 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1984)