Lavette v. Brinsfield

35 S.E. 637, 111 Ga. 821, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 756
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 9, 1900·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. Where in a suit brought in a city court, upon a note embracing a mortgage upon realty, a general judgment on the note and a foreclosure of the mortgage are sought, and a demurrer is sustained to such part of the petition as seeks to foreclose the mortgage, the case may proceed as an action at common law on the note.

2. Where on a loan of money it was agreed that a certain amount should be added for interest up to a specified time, which amount was in excess of legal interest, and it was accordingly added to the amount loaned, and for the aggregate sum a note was given, payable at a time specified and providing that it should bear interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum after maturity, under a proper plea of usury the holder would be entitled to the principal, with lawful interest thereon. Parker v. Lowry, 79 Ga. 740. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lavette v. Brinsfield, 35 S.E. 637, 111 Ga. 821, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 756 (Ga. 1900).

35 S.E. 637 (Lavette v. Brinsfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. Forman
89 S.E. 459 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Means v. Continental Fertilizer Co.
85 S.E. 617 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)