Lavette v. Brinsfield

35 S.E. 637, 111 Ga. 821, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 756
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 9, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 35 S.E. 637 (Lavette v. Brinsfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lavette v. Brinsfield, 35 S.E. 637, 111 Ga. 821, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 756 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Fish, J.

1. Where in a suit brought in a city court, upon a note embracing a mortgage upon realty, a general judgment on the note and a foreclosure of the mortgage are sought, and a demurrer is sustained to such part of the petition as seeks to foreclose the mortgage, the case may proceed as an action at common law on the note.

2. Where on a loan of money it was agreed that a certain amount should be added for interest up to a specified time, which amount was in excess of legal interest, and it was accordingly added to the amount loaned, and for the aggregate sum a note was given, payable at a time specified and providing that it should bear interest at the rate of eight per cent, per annum after maturity, under a proper plea of usury the holder would be entitled to the principal, with lawful interest thereon. Parker v. Lowry, 79 Ga. 740. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. Forman
89 S.E. 459 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Means v. Continental Fertilizer Co.
85 S.E. 617 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 S.E. 637, 111 Ga. 821, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavette-v-brinsfield-ga-1900.