Laveta Anderson v. Jenny Shih Do

CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 8, 2019
Docket159087
StatusPublished

This text of Laveta Anderson v. Jenny Shih Do (Laveta Anderson v. Jenny Shih Do) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laveta Anderson v. Jenny Shih Do, (Mich. 2019).

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 8, 2019 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

159087 & (21) David F. Viviano, Chief Justice Pro Tem

LAVETA ANDERSON and CHARLES J. Stephen J. Markman TAUNT, Brian K. Zahra Plaintiffs-Appellees, Richard H. Bernstein v SC: 159087 Elizabeth T. Clement COA: 344549 Megan K. Cavanagh, Justices Oakland CC: 2016-153143-NH JENNY SHIH, D.O., and THE WELLNESS PLAN, Defendants-Appellants, and INOCENCIO CUESTA, M.D., MALINI VENKATRAM, M.D., SUCHITA BHEEMREDDY, M.D., KARTHIK YADAGIRI, P.T., RUPA PATEL, P.T., UNIVERSITY PHYSICIAN GROUP, VHS PHYSICIANS OF MICHIGAN, HARPER-HUTZEL HOSPITAL, LEGACY HHH, VHS HARPER-HUTZEL, INC., VHS OF MICHIGAN, INC., LEGACY DMC, TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL, THERAMATRIX, INC., d/b/a THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL REHABILITATION, THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL REHABILITATION, THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL THERAPY NETWORK, L.L.C., and THERAMATRIX PHYSICAL THERAPY PLAN, INC., Defendants. ____________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the December 26, 2018 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. Trial court proceedings are stayed pending the completion of this appeal. On motion of a party or on its own motion, the Court of Appeals may modify, set aside, or place conditions on the stay if it appears that the appeal is not being vigorously prosecuted or if other appropriate grounds appear.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 8, 2019 a0305 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Laveta Anderson v. Jenny Shih Do, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laveta-anderson-v-jenny-shih-do-mich-2019.