Lavers Vs. Huizar
This text of 488 P.3d 582 (Lavers Vs. Huizar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
DAVID HARLAN LAVERS, No. 82998 Appellant, vs. CECILIA HUIZAR, AND WALKER BASIN CONSERVANCY, FILED Res iondents. JUN 2 2 2021 ELIZABE/H A. BROWN CLERK9F SpPREME COURT . BY DEPUIY9-.(- CLEN ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This appeal was docketed on June 4, 2021, without payment of the requisite filing fee. See NRAP 3(e). That same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 10 days. The notice advised that failure to comply would result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT ELI ETH A. B OWN
BY:
cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge David Harlan Lavers Cecilia Huizar Walker Basin Conservancy SUPREME COURT OF Washoe District Court Clerk NEVADA
CLERK'S ORDER
01.1947 atellra
_. ir/70sq
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
488 P.3d 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavers-vs-huizar-nev-2021.