Lavern Speer and Champlain McCrea v. United States

388 F.2d 110, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8300
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 24, 1968·No. 21677·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellants, convicted of smuggling amphetamine tablets into the United States, list nine instances in which their appointed trial counsel might have acted otherwise than he did. They conclude that they did not have adequate assistance of counsel or a fair trial and that the District Court erred in not acting sua sponte on their behalf. We fail to see how action by trial counsel in any of these instances could have resulted in a favorable ruling or otherwise altered the result in appellants’ favor. The cumulation adds neither weight nor substance. *111 Nor do we think the district judge should on his own motion have granted a judgment of acquittal on behalf of either appellant.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lavern Speer and Champlain McCrea v. United States, 388 F.2d 110, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8300 (9th Cir. 1968).

388 F.2d 110 (Lavern Speer and Champlain McCrea v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related