Laventall v. Danzig
This text of 239 A.D. 864 (Laventall v. Danzig) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co. v. Claren (237 App. Div. 188); Pearmain v. Massachusetts Hospital Life Ins. Co. (206 Mass. 377), and Stone v. Tilley (100 Tex. 487; 10 L. R. A. [N. S.] 678). Rhodes, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the motion, on the authority of Title G. & T. Co. v. Haven (196 N. Y. 487).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
239 A.D. 864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laventall-v-danzig-nyappdiv-1933.