Laventall v. Danzig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Laventall v. Danzig

239 A.D. 864

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1933·Published

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co. v. Claren (237 App. Div. 188); Pearmain v. Massachusetts Hospital Life Ins. Co. (206 Mass. 377), and Stone v. Tilley (100 Tex. 487; 10 L. R. A. [N. S.] 678). Rhodes, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the motion, on the authority of Title G. & T. Co. v. Haven (196 N. Y. 487).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Lawyers Title & Guaranty Co. v. Claren (237 App. Div. 188); Pearmain v. Massachusetts Hospital Life Ins. Co. (206 Mass. 377), and Stone v. Tilley (100 Tex. 487; 10 L. R. A. [N. S.] 678). Rhodes, Crapser and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to deny the motion, on the authority of Title G. & T. Co. v. Haven (196 N. Y. 487).

Laventall v. Danzig, 239 A.D. 864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

239 A.D. 864 (Laventall v. Danzig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related