Lavena v. Hightower v. State
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER ON MOTION
Cause number: 01-13-01023-CV Style: Lavena V. Hightower v. The State of Texas Date motion filed: May 7, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel Party filing motion: Amanda E. Love, counsel for appellant Document to be filed:
Is appeal accelerated? No
If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:
Ordered that motion is:
Granted If document is to be filed, document due: Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time Denied Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot) Other: Amanda E. Love’s motion to withdraw as appellant’s counsel is granted, and Kathryn Lewis and Beth Mitchell are substituted as appellant’s counsel.
Judge’s Signature: /s/ Jim Sharp
Date: May 29, 2014
November 7, 2008 Revision
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lavena v. Hightower v. State (Lavena v. Hightower v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.