Lavena v. Hightower v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 29, 2014·No. 01-13-01023-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause number: 01-13-01023-CV Style: Lavena V. Hightower v. The State of Texas Date motion filed: May 7, 2014 Type of motion: Motion to Withdraw and Substitute Counsel Party filing motion: Amanda E. Love, counsel for appellant Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time: Original due date: Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date: Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted If document is to be filed, document due:  Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: Amanda E. Love’s motion to withdraw as appellant’s counsel is granted, and Kathryn Lewis and Beth Mitchell are substituted as appellant’s counsel.

Judge’s Signature: /s/ Jim Sharp

Date: May 29, 2014

November 7, 2008 Revision

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lavena v. Hightower v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Lavena v. Hightower v. State (Lavena v. Hightower v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.