Lavelle v. Ribaudo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Lavelle v. Ribaudo

1 A.D.2d 439, 766 N.Y.S.2d 694

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 1 A.D.2d 439 (Lavelle v. Ribaudo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lavelle v. Ribaudo, 1 A.D.2d 439, 766 N.Y.S.2d 694 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Trainor, J.), entered January 8, 2003, which denied her objections to an order of the same court (Flosky, H.E.), entered September 5, 2002, which, after a hearing, denied her petition to direct the father to reinstate health insurance coverage for the children with the Oxford Health Flan.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the mother’s objections to the order entered September 5, 2002, since the father complied with the provisions of the parties’ separation agreement requiring him to provide health insurance for the children. Ritter, J.E, Florio, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Trainor, J.), entered January 8, 2003, which denied her objections to an order of the same court (Flosky, H.E.), entered September 5, 2002, which, after a hearing, denied her petition to direct the father to reinstate health insurance coverage for the children with the Oxford Health Flan.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly denied the mother’s objections to the order entered September 5, 2002, since the father complied with the provisions of the parties’ separation agreement requiring him to provide health insurance for the children. Ritter, J.E, Florio, S. Miller and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 A.D.2d 439, 766 N.Y.S.2d 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavelle-v-ribaudo-nyappdiv-2003.