Lavell Fairbanks v. Hillcrest Apartments
This text of Lavell Fairbanks v. Hillcrest Apartments (Lavell Fairbanks v. Hillcrest Apartments) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00015-CV ___________________________
LAVELL FAIRBANKS, Appellant
V.
HILLCREST APARTMENTS, Appellee
On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-005622-1
Before Sudderth, CJ.; Kerr and Birdwell, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
Appellant’s brief was due May 5, 2022, but he did not file a brief. See Tex. R.
App. P. 38.6(a). On June 6, 2022, we notified Appellant that his brief had not been
filed, and we warned that we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless,
within ten days, Appellant filed a brief along with an accompanying motion
reasonably explaining the brief’s untimeliness. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b), 38.8(a)(1),
42.3(b). More than ten days have passed, but we have not received a response.
Because Appellant has failed to file a brief as the Rules of Appellate Procedure
require, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1),
42.3(b), (c), 43.2(f).
Per Curiam
Delivered: July 21, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lavell Fairbanks v. Hillcrest Apartments, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavell-fairbanks-v-hillcrest-apartments-texapp-2022.