Lave, Joseph Roland
This text of Lave, Joseph Roland (Lave, Joseph Roland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a subsequent application for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 11.071, Section 5.
Applicant was convicted of capital murder on March 29, 1994. We affirmed the conviction and sentence on direct appeal. Lave v. State, No. 71,897 (Tex. Crim. App. November 20, 1996). On January 26, 1998, applicant filed his initial application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.071. We denied relief. Ex parte Lave, No. WR-44,564-01 (Tex. Crim. App. September 20, 2000). Applicant alleges he was denied the right to confront witnesses against him in trial. He admits that the legal basis for this claim depends on this Court's reversal of our opinion in Ex parte Keith, 202 S.W.3d 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006), in which we held that Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), would not be applied retroactively in a state-court proceeding.
Because applicant has not asserted that a new legal basis, previously unavailable, exists now, he has failed to show that he is entitled to review of this subsequent claim under Article 11.071, Section 5(a)(1). This application is dismissed as an abuse of the writ and the motion for stay is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2007.
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Lave, Joseph Roland, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lave-joseph-roland-texcrimapp-2007.