Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lavaoley v. State

Lavaoley v. State

616 So. 2d 627, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4514, 1993 WL 116740
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 16, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1886
StatusPublished

This text of 616 So. 2d 627 (Lavaoley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lavaoley v. State, 616 So. 2d 627, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4514, 1993 WL 116740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Allen R. Lavaoley appeals his conviction and sentences for grand theft and trafficking in stolen property, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Mr. Lavaoley pled no contest to the charges. Appellant’s argument does not fall within the exception to the general rule that ineffectiveness of counsel may not be raised for the first time on direct appeal. Blanco v. Wainwright, 507 So.2d 1377 (Fla.1987); Harris v. State, 580 So.2d 243 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Fasano v. State, 548 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, WOLF and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanco v. Wainwright
507 So. 2d 1377 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Fasano v. State
548 So. 2d 1191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Harris v. State
580 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 So. 2d 627, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4514, 1993 WL 116740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavaoley-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.