Lavandra Donteka Rushing v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 29, 2015·No. 05-14-01252-CR·Published

Opinion

Affirmed and Opinion Filed September 29, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-01251-CR

No. 05-14-01252-CR

LAVANDRA DONTEKA RUSHING, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-61091-W, F12-10110-W

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Bridges, Francis, and Myers Opinion by Justice Francis

Lavandra Donteka Rushing appeals her convictions for abandoning a child with the intention to return and theft of property valued at $1,500 or more but less than $20,000. The trial court assessed punishment in each case at confinement for eighteen months in a state jail facility. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised

appellant of her right to file a pro se response, but she did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (identifying duties of appellate courts and counsel in Anders cases).

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.

We affirm the trial court’s judgments.

Do Not Publish TEX. R. APP. P. 47

141251F.U05

/Molly Francis/

MOLLY FRANCIS

JUSTICE

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

LAVANDRA DONTEKA RUSHING, Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.

F13-61091-W).

No. 05-14-01251-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered September 29, 2015.

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

LAVANDRA DONTEKA RUSHING, Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Appellant Court of Dallas County, Texas (Tr.Ct.No.

F12-10110-W).

No. 05-14-01252-CR V. Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Bridges and Myers participating.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment adjudicating guilt is AFFIRMED.

Judgment entered September 29, 2015.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lavandra Donteka Rushing v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Lavandra Donteka Rushing v. State (Lavandra Donteka Rushing v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Bledsoe v. State
178 S.W.3d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
High v. State
573 S.W.2d 807 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1978)
Kelly, Sylvester
436 S.W.3d 313 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)