Lavan v. Singletary

707 So. 2d 1206, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3815, 1998 WL 171066
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 1998
DocketNo. 96-3715
StatusPublished

This text of 707 So. 2d 1206 (Lavan v. Singletary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lavan v. Singletary, 707 So. 2d 1206, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3815, 1998 WL 171066 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 703 So.2d 1202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997), we sua sponte treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. Finding that the trial court did not depart from the essential requirements of law, we deny the petition.

MINER, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sheley v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
703 So. 2d 1202 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
707 So. 2d 1206, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3815, 1998 WL 171066, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavan-v-singletary-fladistctapp-1998.