Lavan Maurice Walker v. State of Florida

345 F. App'x 458
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedSeptember 10, 2009
Docket08-16831
StatusUnpublished

This text of 345 F. App'x 458 (Lavan Maurice Walker v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lavan Maurice Walker v. State of Florida, 345 F. App'x 458 (11th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Lavan Maurice Walker, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For a district court to exercise subject-matter jurisdiction over a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the petitioner must be “in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” Id. §§ 2241(c)(3), 2254(a); accord Maleng v. Cook, 490 U.S. 488, 490-91, 109 S.Ct. 1923, 1925, 104 L.Ed.2d 540 (1989). Jurisdiction does not extend to a petitioner who challenges a conviction after his sentence has completely expired. White v. Butterworth, 70 F.3d 573, 574 (11th Cir.1995). The district court lacked jurisdiction to review Walker’s petition because his sentences expired in 2002.

We AFFIRM the dismissal of Walker’s petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

White v. Butterworth
70 F.3d 573 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
Maleng v. Cook
490 U.S. 488 (Supreme Court, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
345 F. App'x 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lavan-maurice-walker-v-state-of-florida-ca11-2009.