Lauzon v. Lauzon

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Lauzon v. Lauzon

664 N.E.2d 451, 422 Mass. 1010, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 112

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMay 13, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 664 N.E.2d 451 (Lauzon v. Lauzon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lauzon v. Lauzon, 664 N.E.2d 451, 422 Mass. 1010, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 112 (Mass. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

The petitioner, Stephen Lauzon, proceeded pro se before a single justice [1011]*1011of this court and on his appeal. The papers in the appellate record do not disclose with any sufficient degree of clarity the nature of the claimed error in the trial court. The petitioner, consequently, did not show any basis for relief by the single justice pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), and, in particular, whether he lacks a remedy through the ordinary course of appeal.

Stephen Lauzon, pro se.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petitioner, Stephen Lauzon, proceeded pro se before a single justice [1011]*1011of this court and on his appeal. The papers in the appellate record do not disclose with any sufficient degree of clarity the nature of the claimed error in the trial court. The petitioner, consequently, did not show any basis for relief by the single justice pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), and, in particular, whether he lacks a remedy through the ordinary course of appeal.

Stephen Lauzon, pro se.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

664 N.E.2d 451, 422 Mass. 1010, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauzon-v-lauzon-mass-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack