Lauzon v. Lauzon
664 N.E.2d 451, 422 Mass. 1010, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 112
Opinion
The petitioner, Stephen Lauzon, proceeded pro se before a single justice [1011] of this court and on his appeal. The papers in the appellate record do not disclose with any sufficient degree of clarity the nature of the claimed error in the trial court. The petitioner, consequently, did not show any basis for relief by the single justice pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3 (1994 ed.), and, in particular, whether he lacks a remedy through the ordinary course of appeal.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lauzon v. Lauzon, 664 N.E.2d 451, 422 Mass. 1010, 1996 Mass. LEXIS 112 (Mass. 1996).
664 N.E.2d 451 (Lauzon v. Lauzon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
§ 3
Massachusetts § 3