Laux v. Board of Supervisors

654 F. App'x 129
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 10, 2016
DocketNo. 16-1018
StatusPublished

This text of 654 F. App'x 129 (Laux v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laux v. Board of Supervisors, 654 F. App'x 129 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

David J. Laux and Tara K. Laux appeal the district court’s order granting defendants’ motion to dismiss their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the contentions on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Laux v. Bd. Of Supervisors of Fairfax Cty. Va., No. 1:15-cv-01334-LMB-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 11, 2015); see Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923); Dist. of Columbia Ct. of App. v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
263 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1924)
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
460 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
654 F. App'x 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laux-v-board-of-supervisors-ca4-2016.