Lauth v. Badeaux

Appellate Court of Illinois

Lauth v. Badeaux

189 Ill. App. 88

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 8, 1914·No. Gen. No. 19,480·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Evidence, § 338*—when parol evidence inadmissible. The rule that when a written instrument is incidental to an agreement the whole transaction may be shown by parol, held not applicable when the suit instead of being based on a parol agreement is based on the terms of the written instrument which plaintiff endeavors to alter by offering evidence of the parol agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Evidence, § 338*—when parol evidence inadmissible. The rule that when a written instrument is incidental to an agreement the whole transaction may be shown by parol, held not applicable when the suit instead of being based on a parol agreement is based on the terms of the written instrument which plaintiff endeavors to alter by offering evidence of the parol agreement.

Lauth v. Badeaux, 189 Ill. App. 88 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

189 Ill. App. 88 (Lauth v. Badeaux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.