Lauth v. Badeaux

Appellate Court of Illinois

Lauth v. Badeaux

189 Ill. App. 88

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 8, 1914

DocketGen. No. 19,480

StatusPublished

This text of 189 Ill. App. 88 (Lauth v. Badeaux) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lauth v. Badeaux, 189 Ill. App. 88 (Ill. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Evidence, § 338*—when parol evidence inadmissible. The rule that when a written instrument is incidental to an agreement the whole transaction may be shown by parol, held not applicable when the suit instead of being based on a parol agreement is based on the terms of the written instrument which plaintiff endeavors to alter by offering evidence of the parol agreement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Pam

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Evidence, § 338*—when parol evidence inadmissible. The rule that when a written instrument is incidental to an agreement the whole transaction may be shown by parol, held not applicable when the suit instead of being based on a parol agreement is based on the terms of the written instrument which plaintiff endeavors to alter by offering evidence of the parol agreement.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 Ill. App. 88, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauth-v-badeaux-illappct-1914.