Lautenschleger v. Royal Indemnity Company
This text of 190 S.E.2d 406 (Lautenschleger v. Royal Indemnity Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think it clear under any version of plaintiff’s evidence that her injuries did not result from an accident while occupying the insured vehicle within the meaning of the medical payments provision of her insurance policy. She has simply failed to show that her fall occurred while she was “in or upon or entering into or alighting from” the automobile. Jarvis v. Insurance Co., 244 N.C. 691, 94 S.E. 2d 843. We affirm the directed verdict entered for defendant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
190 S.E.2d 406, 15 N.C. App. 579, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lautenschleger-v-royal-indemnity-company-ncctapp-1972.