Lautenschleger v. Royal Indemnity Company
190 S.E.2d 406, 15 N.C. App. 579, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1976
Opinion
We think it clear under any version of plaintiff’s evidence that her injuries did not result from an accident while occupying the insured vehicle within the meaning of the medical payments provision of her insurance policy. She has simply failed to show that her fall occurred while she was “in or upon or entering into or alighting from” the automobile. Jarvis v. Insurance Co., 244 N.C. 691, 94 S.E. 2d 843. We affirm the directed verdict entered for defendant.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lautenschleger v. Royal Indemnity Company, 190 S.E.2d 406, 15 N.C. App. 579, 1972 N.C. App. LEXIS 1976 (N.C. Ct. App. 1972).
190 S.E.2d 406 (Lautenschleger v. Royal Indemnity Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leonard v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
411 S.E.2d 178 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1991)
Miller v. Loman
518 N.E.2d 486 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1987)
Joins v. Bonner
504 N.E.2d 61 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1986)
Mondelli v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
475 A.2d 76 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1984)
Rosebrooks v. National General Insurance
434 N.E.2d 675 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1982)
Manning v. Summit Home Insurance
623 P.2d 1235 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1980)
Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. Garcia
368 So. 2d 1313 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)