Laute v. Gearhart
170 A. 646, 112 N.J.L. 382, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 283
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Eldredge in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Tkenchabd, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Pekskie, Van Buskibk, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Laute v. Gearhart, 170 A. 646, 112 N.J.L. 382, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 283 (N.J. 1934).
170 A. 646 (Laute v. Gearhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patrick v. Brago
66 A.2d 749 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)