Laute v. Gearhart
170 A. 646, 112 N.J.L. 382, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 283
This text of 170 A. 646 (Laute v. Gearhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Laute v. Gearhart, 170 A. 646, 112 N.J.L. 382, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 283 (N.J. 1934).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Eldredge in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Tkenchabd, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Pekskie, Van Buskibk, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 15.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Patrick v. Brago
66 A.2d 749 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
170 A. 646, 112 N.J.L. 382, 1934 N.J. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laute-v-gearhart-nj-1934.