Lauryn Mitchell, Emonie Walker, L.S.(Minor), L.B.(Minor) v. Adam Estrada, Jr.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 21, 2022
Docket02-22-00005-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Lauryn Mitchell, Emonie Walker, L.S.(Minor), L.B.(Minor) v. Adam Estrada, Jr. (Lauryn Mitchell, Emonie Walker, L.S.(Minor), L.B.(Minor) v. Adam Estrada, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lauryn Mitchell, Emonie Walker, L.S.(Minor), L.B.(Minor) v. Adam Estrada, Jr., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-22-00005-CV ___________________________

LAURYN MITCHELL, EMONIE WALKER, L.S.(MINOR), L.B.(MINOR), Appellants

V.

ADAM ESTRADA, JR., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 2021-005059-2

Before Sudderth, C.J.; Kerr and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Walker MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Lauryn Mitchell, attempts to appeal an interlocutory order that

granted Appellee’s special appearance and dismissed Appellant’s claims (but not the

claims of any other plaintiffs) against Appellee. However, Appellant’s notice of

appeal was untimely, and when this court expressed concern that it lacked jurisdiction,

Appellant failed to file a response. Therefore, we will dismiss the appeal.

“[T]he time for filing a notice of appeal is jurisdictional in this court, and absent

a timely-filed notice of appeal or timely-filed motion for extension, we must dismiss

the appeal.” In re Guardianship of Fulbright, No. 02-16-00230-CV, 2016 WL 4395804,

at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 18, 2016 no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op.); see Tex.

R. App. P. 25.1(b); Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997). Interlocutory

appeals are accelerated, and any corresponding notices of appeal must be filed within

20 days. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(b), 28.1(a). An appeal from an order granting a special

appearance is an interlocutory order. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann.

§ 51.014(a)(7).

Because the trial court’s order was entered on November 29, 2021, Appellant’s

accelerated notice of appeal was due on Monday, December 20, 2021. However,

Appellant did not file her notice of appeal until December 28, 2021, and did not

include with it any motion or explanation for its untimeliness. See Tex. R. App.

P. 26.3 (granting appellate courts the ability to extend time to file a notice of appeal

“if, within 15 days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal” the party files its

2 notice of appeal along with a Rule 10.5(b) motion to extend time). On January 28,

2022, we notified Appellant of our concern that we lacked jurisdiction over this

appeal because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. We further notified

Appellant that her appeal might be dismissed for want of jurisdiction unless she or

another party could show this court a reasonable explanation for the late filing. See

Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617. We received no such explanation.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App.

P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

/s/ Brian Walker

Brian Walker Justice

Delivered: April 21, 2022

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Verburgt v. Dorner
959 S.W.2d 615 (Texas Supreme Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lauryn Mitchell, Emonie Walker, L.S.(Minor), L.B.(Minor) v. Adam Estrada, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauryn-mitchell-emonie-walker-lsminor-lbminor-v-adam-estrada-texapp-2022.