Home/Supreme Court/Lauro v. Barker

Lauro v. Barker

299 U.S. 521, 57 S. Ct. 321
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 18, 1937
DocketNo. 374
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 299 U.S. 521 (Lauro v. Barker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lauro v. Barker, 299 U.S. 521, 57 S. Ct. 321 (1937).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellees to affirm the judgment is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. (1) Bellingham Bay Co. [522]*522v. New Whatcom, 172 U. S. 314, 318, 319; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 81; Wick v. Chelan Electric Co., 280 U. S. 108, 110, 111. (2) Gilfillan v. Union Canal Co., 109 U. S. 401.

Mr. Henry N. Rapaport, with whom Messrs. Irving S. Rapaport and Robert S. Garson were on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Lawrence S. Greenbaum, Benjamin J. Rabin, Theodore S. Jaffin, Benjamin Kaplan, and Maurice Finkelstein were on the brief for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Slewett & Farber v. Board of Assessors of County of Nassau
80 A.D.2d 186 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
In re Ogilvie
83 Misc. 2d 896 (Rockland County Court, 1975)
In re the Accounting of Security Trust Co.
189 Misc. 748 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1947)
In re Colonial Trust Co.
189 Misc. 335 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Vanneck v. City Bank Farmers Trust Co.
185 Misc. 491 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 U.S. 521, 57 S. Ct. 321, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauro-v-barker-scotus-1937.