LAURITO v. State
83 So. 3d 980, 2012 WL 966568, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4590
This text of 83 So. 3d 980 (LAURITO v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
LAURITO v. State, 83 So. 3d 980, 2012 WL 966568, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4590 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
Although the trial court conducted an evidentiary hearing on Appellant’s rule 3.850 motion, it failed to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by rule 3.850(d). Accordingly, we reverse and remand this cause with instructions that the trial court make the required findings. Dillbeck v. State, 882 So.2d 969 (Fla.2004).
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Dillbeck v. State
882 So. 2d 969 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
83 So. 3d 980, 2012 WL 966568, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laurito-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.