Laurita v. Deleon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Laurita v. Deleon

50 A.D.2d 745, 376 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11526

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 4, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 745 (Laurita v. Deleon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laurita v. Deleon, 50 A.D.2d 745, 376 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on June 7, 1974, dismissing the petition herein, by which appellant [746]*746sought review of respondents’ determination discharging him from his position as an employee (motor vehicle operator) of the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The administrative findings were supported by substantial evidence, and petitioner was not deprived of any procedural rights. We have examined petitioner’s other contentions, including his claim that termination from employment constituted an excessive and arbitrary penalty, and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, J. P., Lupiano, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, entered on June 7, 1974, dismissing the petition herein, by which appellant [746]*746sought review of respondents’ determination discharging him from his position as an employee (motor vehicle operator) of the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The administrative findings were supported by substantial evidence, and petitioner was not deprived of any procedural rights. We have examined petitioner’s other contentions, including his claim that termination from employment constituted an excessive and arbitrary penalty, and find them to be without merit. Concur — Murphy, J. P., Lupiano, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 745, 376 N.Y.S.2d 514, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laurita-v-deleon-nyappdiv-1975.