Laurinda Hinkle v. Riley Aviation Inc

Opinion

Order Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh 127829 Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. LAURINDA HINKLE and ESTATE OF CRAIG Stephen J. Markman, D. HINKLE, by LAURINDA HINKLE, Personal Justices Representative,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v SC: 127829

COA: 247099

Branch CC: 96-003161-NP

CESSNA AIRCRAFT CO.,

Defendant-Appellant,

and LEAR ROMEC, a/k/a HYDRO-AIRE, and

TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS, a/k/a

TELEDYNE INDUSTRIES,

Defendants-Appellees, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Intervenor-Appellee,

and RILEY AVIATION, INC., HANSEATIC AIR,

INC., HANSEATIC AIR OF MICHIGAN, INC.,

COLDWATER AIR, INC., TRI-STATE

AIRMOTIVE, LLC., AIRCRAFT ACCESSORIES

OF OKLAHOMA, and TRI-STATE AVIATION

SERVICES,

Defendants.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. September 28, 2005 _________________________________________ d0919 Clerk