Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue v. Hubert Rutland and Ruth Rutland, His Wife
This text of 327 F.2d 668 (Laurie W. Tomlinson, District Director of Internal Revenue v. Hubert Rutland and Ruth Rutland, His Wife) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
327 F.2d 668
Laurie W. TOMLINSON, District Director of Internal Revenue, Appellant,
v.
Hubert RUTLAND and Ruth Rutland, his wife, Appellees.
No. 20542.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
February 19, 1964.
Appeal from United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, William A. McRae, Jr., Judge.
James H. Walsh, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Atty., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., Edith House, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Harry Baum, Timothy Dyk, Attys., Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
S. E. Simmons, St. Petersburg, Fla., for appellees.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS* and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The facts here presented are different only in detail from those in Commissioner v. Birch Ranch and Oil Co., 9th Cir. 1951, 192 F.2d 924, affirming Birch Ranch and Oil Co. v. Commissioner, 13 T.C. 930. The principles there stated are sound and require the affirmance of the district court.
Affirmed.
Notes:
Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
327 F.2d 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laurie-w-tomlinson-district-director-of-internal-revenue-v-hubert-ca5-1964.