Laurie Poe v. Omni Flow Computers, Inc.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 14-15-00674-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 8/11/2015 3:25:54 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK
NO. 14-15-00674-CV Tr Ct No. 2014-33603 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 8/11/2015 3:25:54 PM FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
LAURIE POE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OMNI FLOW COMPUTERS, INC.
Appellee.
APPELLEE OMNI FLOW COMPUTERS, INC.’S RESPONSE TO APPELLANT’S OPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE APPELLANT’S NOTICE OF APPEAL
TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS:
Appellee/Defendant Omni Flow Computers, Inc. (“Appellee”) files this
Response to Appellant/Plaintiff Laurie Poe’s (“Appellant”) Opposed Motion to
Extend the Deadline to File Appellant’s Notice of Appeal and would respectfully
show the Court of Appeals as follows: I.
Appellant filed her underlying lawsuit against Omni on June 11, 2014 in the
11th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas (“Trial Court”). On June 23,
2015, the Trial Court granted Appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment and
dismissed the underlying lawsuit in its entirety with prejudice. See Exhibit 1. In
particular, the Trial Court granted Appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment, inter
alia, because Appellant failed to timely file her lawsuit in accordance with TEX.
LAB. CODE § 61.062(b). See Exhibit 2. Accordingly, Appellant was required to
file a notice of appeal on or before July 23, 2015. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1. Appellant
did not file a notice of appeal until August 5, 2015. See Exhibit 3. Therefore,
Appellant’s Notice of Appeal is untimely and should be dismissed.
II.
A party must file a notice of appeal with the clerk of the district court within
30 days after the judgment is signed in order to timely perfect an appeal. TEX. R.
APP. P. 26.1. Here, Appellee did not file her Notice of Appeal until August 5,
2015, 43 days after the date of the Summary Judgment Order. See Exhibit 3.
Therefore, Appellant’s Notice of Appeal was filed untimely and this appeal should
be dismissed.
Rule 26.3 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure allows an appellate court to
extend the time to file a notice of appeal if, within fifteen days after the notice is
2 due, the appellant files their notice of appeal with the trial court and files a Rule
10.5(b) motion to extend time with the appellate court. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. The
appellant must still provide a reasonable explanation for why an extension of time
is necessary. See Smith v. Houston Lighting & Power Co., 7 S.W.3d 287, 288 (Tex.
App.–Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, no pet.). In the present case, Appellant’s
explanation in her Motion is not reasonable, but instead demonstrates the
continued pattern of untimely filings and constant delays by Appellant.
Specifically, the Trial Court granted Appellee’s Motion for Summary Judgment,
inter alia, because Appellant failed to timely file her lawsuit in accordance with
TEX. LAB. CODE § 61.062(b). See Exhibit 2. Therefore, Appellant should not be
allowed to profit from her constant delays, and this appeal should be dismissed.
PRAYER
For all of the foregoing reasons, Appellee prays that the Court deny
Appellant’s Motion to Extend the Deadline to File Appellant’s Notice of Appeal,
dismiss Appellant’s appeal, and for all such other and further relief to which
Appellee may show itself to be justly entitled.
3 Respectfully submitted,
GORDON & REES, LLP
By: /s/ Glenn R. LeMay Glenn R. LeMay State Bar No. 12188690 glemay@gordonrees.com Joseph W. DiCecco State Bar No. 05812520 jdicecco@gordonrees.com Andrew M. Scott State Bar No. 24075042 ascott@gordonrees.com 1900 West Loop South, Suite 1000 Houston, Texas 77027 (713) 961-3366 – Telephone (713) 961-3938 – Facsimile
ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing document was duly served upon the following on this the 11th day of August, 2015, as follows:
Linda Leeser By Email: lindaleeser@hotmail.com LAW OFFICE OF LINDA LEESER 8800 Broadway St., Suite 210 San Antonio, Texas 78217
Ben J. Raia By Email: bjroffice@gmail.com BEN J. RAIA & ASSOCIATES, PLLC 306 S. Friendswood Drive, Unit C Friendswood, Texas 77546
/s/ Glenn R. LeMay GLENN R. LEMAY
1104212/24604670v.1 4
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Laurie Poe v. Omni Flow Computers, Inc. (Laurie Poe v. Omni Flow Computers, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.