Laurie J. Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co., Inc

201 F.2d 671

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Laurie J. Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co., Inc. Read the opinion of the Court — 180 F.2d 749 →

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided February 3, 1953·No. 10816_1·Published

Opinion

201 F.2d 671

97 U.S.P.Q. 1

Laurie J. CARPENTER, Appellant,
v.
ROHM & HAAS CO., Inc.

No. 10816.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Jan. 8, 1953.
Decided Jan. 12, 1953.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 3, 1953.

James R. Morford and Morton E. Evans, Wilmington, Del. (Morford, Bennethum, Marvel & Cooch, Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Rodney, 109 F.Supp. 739.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

201 F.2d 671

97 U.S.P.Q. 1

Laurie J. CARPENTER, Appellant,
v.
ROHM & HAAS CO., Inc.

No. 10816.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued Jan. 8, 1953.
Decided Jan. 12, 1953.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 3, 1953.

James R. Morford and Morton E. Evans, Wilmington, Del. (Morford, Bennethum, Marvel & Cooch, Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MARIS, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Judge Rodney, 109 F.Supp. 739.

Laurie J. Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co., Inc, 201 F.2d 671 (3d Cir. 1953).

Pincite

201 F.2d 671 (Laurie J. Carpenter v. Rohm & Haas Co., Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.