Lauridsen v. Alexander
16 F.2d 432, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3876
This text of 16 F.2d 432 (Lauridsen v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lauridsen v. Alexander, 16 F.2d 432, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3876 (9th Cir. 1926).
Opinion
In its legal aspect this case is identical with No. 4742, Katie Roberts Wilson v. Margaret Jane Robinson et al., 16 F.(2d) 431, this day decided, and for the reasons assigned in that case the decree is affirmed, as there modified.
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge, dissents, for the reason stated in Wilson v. Robinson, supra.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Wilson v. Robinson
16 F.2d 431 (Ninth Circuit, 1926)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 F.2d 432, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3876, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauridsen-v-alexander-ca9-1926.