Laurice Lamer Prince v. United States

376 F.2d 42, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6585
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 28, 1967
Docket23593
StatusPublished

This text of 376 F.2d 42 (Laurice Lamer Prince v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laurice Lamer Prince v. United States, 376 F.2d 42, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6585 (5th Cir. 1967).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted by jury verdict on all counts of a five-count indictment charging him with embezzlement of bank funds in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 656. He was sentenced to concurrent four-year terms under each of the first four counts. Imposition of sentence under the fifth count was suspended and appellant was placed on probation for five years to commence at the expiration of his sentence.

On this appeal, appellant urges that the indictment under which he was convicted was fatally defective, that there was no evidence to support his conviction, and that the conduct and remarks of the court during the trial together with its failure to admonish the jurors not to read newspaper accounts of the trial constituted prejudicial error.

Convinced after a careful review of the entire record that there occurred no reversible error, we accordingly

Affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 F.2d 42, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laurice-lamer-prince-v-united-states-ca5-1967.