Lauria v. Lauria

45 A.D.3d 535, 845 N.Y.S.2d 121
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 7, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 45 A.D.3d 535 (Lauria v. Lauria) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lauria v. Lauria, 45 A.D.3d 535, 845 N.Y.S.2d 121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

[536]*536In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McNulty, J.), dated December 30, 2005, as, upon granting that branch of his motion which was, in effect, to direct the Suffolk County Child Support Enforcement Bureau to credit his child support account in the sum of $16,174.23 as against his arrears, in effect, denied that branch of his motion which was, in effect, to direct the Suffolk County Child Support Enforcement Bureau to credit his child support account in the additional sum of $22,777.98, resulting in a credit in the total sum of $38,952.21.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, with costs, and that branch of the defendant’s motion which was, in effect, to direct the Suffolk County Child Support Enforcement Bureau to credit his child support account in the additional sum of $22,777.98, resulting in a credit in the total sum of $38,952.21, is granted.

As the defendant correctly contends, the Supreme Court erred in failing to credit his child support account for the entire amount that he paid for the plaintiffs mortgage pursuant to a pendente lite order because the payment of the mortgage in addition to child support resulted in giving the plaintiff a double shelter allowance (see Graham v Graham, 277 AD2d 423, 424 [2000]; see also Fogarty v Fogarty, 284 AD2d 300, 301 [2001]; Markopoulos v Markopoulos, 274 AD2d 457 [2000]; Krantz v Krantz, 175 AD2d 865, 866 [1991]). Schmidt, J.P., Skelos, Lifson and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stern v. Stern
2018 NY Slip Op 6959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
State Ex Rel. Tegegne v. Andalo
2015 SD 57 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2015)
Spiegel-Porco v. Porco
127 A.D.3d 847 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Harris v. Harris
97 A.D.3d 534 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Bandler v. Bandler
58 A.D.3d 774 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 A.D.3d 535, 845 N.Y.S.2d 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauria-v-lauria-nyappdiv-2007.