Lauria v. Jaburg Bros.

227 A.D. 632

This text of 227 A.D. 632 (Lauria v. Jaburg Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lauria v. Jaburg Bros., 227 A.D. 632 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to plead over within ten days upon payment of such costs. The complaint is defective in that, viewed as an action for damages for breach of a contract, there is no allegation of performance on the part of the plaintiff and there are no requisite allegations to sustain it on the theory of rescission. (Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works, 166 App. Div. 208.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Seeger and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hedges v. Pioneer Iron Works
166 A.D. 208 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 A.D. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lauria-v-jaburg-bros-nyappdiv-1929.