Laurent v. United States

149 F.2d 598, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2627
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 15, 1945
DocketNo. 10773
StatusPublished

This text of 149 F.2d 598 (Laurent v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laurent v. United States, 149 F.2d 598, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2627 (9th Cir. 1945).

Opinion

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

On March 1, 1944, appellant and six others — Russell S. Youmans, Percy Newford, Arthur Grenier, Albert Norwitt, Charles E. Corsiglia and Bernard R. Kerns — were indicted for conspiring1 to acquire, use, permit the use of, transfer, possess and control “counterfeited and forged ration documents, to-wit, counterfeited and forged C-2 gasoline mileage ration coupons,”2 and to obtain and attempt to obtain “a rationed commodity, to-wit, gasoline, without presenting the prescribed ration coupons therefor.” 3 Appellant’s codefendants pleaded guilty. Appellant pleaded not guilty, was tried, convicted and sentenced, and has appealed. The question is whether the evidence supports appellant’s conviction.

There is no evidence that appellant conspired with his codefendants, or any of them, to acquire, use, permit the use of, transfer, possess or control counterfeited or forged C-2 gasoline mileage ration coupons, or to obtain or attempt to obtain gasoline without presenting the prescribed ration coupons therefor.

There is no evidence that appellant knew, or had any dealings with, any of his codefendants except Newford. There is no evidence that appellant had any dealings with Newford except that appellant purchased from Newford 128 C-2 gasoline mileage ration coupons (two sheets of 64 coupons each) in November or December, 1943, and 2,560 C-2 gasoline mileage ration coupons (40 sheets of 64 coupons each) in January or February, 1944.4 There is no evidence that the coupons purchased from Newford were counterfeited or forged.

There is evidence that the coupons purchased from Newford had been obtained by Newford from Youmans, and that on February 16, 1944, Youmans had in his possession 80,612 C-2 gasoline mileage ration coupons (1,258 sheets of 64 coupons each),5 all of which were counterfeited. These, however, did not include any of the coupons purchased from Newford by appellant. Appellant, so far as the evidence shows, had nothing to do with any of the 80,612 counterfeited coupons.

There is evidence that on some undisclosed date or dates, appellant (a dealer) obtained gasoline by surrendering in exchange therefor 325 counterfeited C-2 gasoline mileage ration coupons,6 but there is no evidence that he conspired to do so. There is no evidence that any of the 325 counterfeited coupons was purchased from New-[600]*600ford. Newford, so far as the evidence shows, had nothing to do with any of these coupons.

We conclude that the evidence does not support appellant’s conviction.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 88
18 U.S.C. § 88

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 F.2d 598, 1945 U.S. App. LEXIS 2627, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laurent-v-united-states-ca9-1945.