Laurence Robert Larose A/K/A Rowdey Krzewinski v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Laurence Robert Larose A/K/A Rowdey Krzewinski v. State

DecidedJune 3, 2004

Docket13-04-00087-CR

StatusPublished

This text of Laurence Robert Larose A/K/A Rowdey Krzewinski v. State (Laurence Robert Larose A/K/A Rowdey Krzewinski v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laurence Robert Larose A/K/A Rowdey Krzewinski v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-04-087-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

LAURENCE ROBERT LAROSE A/K/A

ROWDEY KRZEWINSKI, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 105th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, LAURENCE ROBERT LAROSE A/K/A ROWDEY KRZEWINSKI, attempts to appeal a conviction for sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child. The trial court has certified that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On February 23, 2004, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On May 21, 2004, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response fails to establish either that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 3rd day fo June, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-04-087-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

LAURENCE ROBERT LAROSE A/K/A

ROWDEY KRZEWINSKI, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 105th District Court of Nueces County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez, and Castillo

Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, LAURENCE ROBERT LAROSE A/K/A ROWDEY KRZEWINSKI, attempts to appeal a conviction for sexual assault of a child and indecency with a child. The trial court has certified that “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On February 23, 2004, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On May 21, 2004, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel’s response fails to establish either that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 3rd day fo June, 2004.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Laurence Robert Larose A/K/A Rowdey Krzewinski v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laurence-robert-larose-aka-rowdey-krzewinski-v-sta-texapp-2004.