Laurence R. And Arline P. Green, and Joseph E. And Judith T. Gentle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of 60 F.3d 142 (Laurence R. And Arline P. Green, and Joseph E. And Judith T. Gentle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Laurence and Arline Green and Joseph and Judith Gentle appeal from decisions of the Tax Court holding that benefits they received under the Connecticut Heart and Hypertension Act, Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 7-433c (West 1989), are part of gross income for federal tax purposes. Benefits are paid under Section 7-433c to firefighters and police officers who suffer “either off duty or on duty any condition or impairment of health caused by hypertension or heart disease.” Id. The Greens and the Gentles argue that such benefits should be exempt from taxation under applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and regulations because the Connecticut act is “a statute in the nature of a workmen’s compensation act which provides compensation to employees for personal injuries or sickness incurred in the course of employment.” 26 C.F.R. § 1.104 — 1(b).
However, a statute that provides benefits to ailing employees is not considered to be “in the nature of a workmen’s compensation act” unless the benefits are paid for ailments that are work-related. As we noted in Rutter v. Commissioner, 760 F.2d 466 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848, 106 S.Ct. 141, 88 L.Ed.2d 116 (1986), “[ujnless a statute contains some provision restricting the payment of benefits to eases of work-related disabilities, it is not in the nature of a workmen’s compensation statute.” Id. at 468; see also Take v. Commissioner, 804 F.2d 663 (9th Cir.1986). Because Section 7-433c provides benefits to police officers and firefighters who suffer from hypertension and heart disease whether or not those conditions are work-related, benefits paid thereunder are part of gross income.
We therefore affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 142, 76 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5776, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laurence-r-and-arline-p-green-and-joseph-e-and-judith-t-gentle-v-ca2-1995.