Laurel Run Mining Co. v. Maynard

575 F. App'x 188
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 18, 2014
DocketNo. 12-2581
StatusPublished

This text of 575 F. App'x 188 (Laurel Run Mining Co. v. Maynard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laurel Run Mining Co. v. Maynard, 575 F. App'x 188 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Laurel Run Mining Company petitions for review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C. §§ 901-945 (2012). Our review of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Laurel Run Mining Co. v. Maynard, Nos. 11-0817 BLA; 12-0032 BLA (B.R.B. Oct. 31, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 901-945
30 U.S.C. § 901-945
§ 901
30 U.S.C. § 901

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
575 F. App'x 188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laurel-run-mining-co-v-maynard-ca4-2014.