Laura v. Puncerelli

105 A. 894, 92 N.J.L. 518, 7 Gummere 518, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 287
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedOctober 11, 1918
StatusPublished

This text of 105 A. 894 (Laura v. Puncerelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Laura v. Puncerelli, 105 A. 894, 92 N.J.L. 518, 7 Gummere 518, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 287 (N.J. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Swayze in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, sJJ. 11.

For reversal — White, J. 1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 A. 894, 92 N.J.L. 518, 7 Gummere 518, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 287, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laura-v-puncerelli-nj-1918.